rock paper scissors probability calculator

Wow, that's a lot of unnecessary extra work. This case is more complicated, because $4$ wins too soon can cause $X$ to win before round $20$.
Rock Paper Scissors is a new resource in Year 6 exploring concepts in Probability. What is the optimal strategy to win? We know that $X$ will win Round 20 and must be ahead by $4$ after Round 19; we will consider the possibilities for Rounds 14-19.

Does "a point you choose" include any movable surface? Specifically, the loss cannot occur after $4$ wins; otherwise $X$ would win before Round 20. You must write down all ties! What is the probability that Alice is the ultimate winner? The focus of these lessons is the notion of randomness. $$\text{Alice wins 5, Bob wins 6, 2 draws}$$ $P(\text{Bob wins}) = 3p \cdot 44q + 7p \cdot 6q = \frac{3}{10}\cdot\frac{44}{50} + \frac{7}{10} \cdot {6}{50} = \frac{132}{500} + \frac{42}{500} = \frac{174}{500} = \frac{87}{250}$. $$\text{Alice wins 3, Bob wins 8, 9 draws} - Lose$$ Since the $6^{\text{th}}$ win must occur on Round 20, he/she must win $5$ and tie $1$ over the preceding six rounds. Are websites a good investment? -- game 19 is draw, game 18, is winnie pants and of 14-17 one is a losie-pants win: $4$ ways. A Question Regarding the Meaning of a Question About the Probability of a R-P-S Game.

$$\text{Alice wins 11, Bob wins 6, 3 draws} - Win$$

\end{align} Wait, no!

Use MathJax to format equations.

Using this information, you can work out a winning strategy!

Creating new Help Center documents for Review queues: Project overview, A seeming paradox in a coin-flipping game, Probability and crytography problem of card game.

Possibility it is Losie-pants: $6$. Very fascinating probability game about maximising greed? A large study showed that it is possible to predict people’s likely moves based on whether they win or lose in their previous game.

Possible ways for 1 to happen: $3$. So 1 was a draw. My boss makes me using cracked software.

For Alice to be $1$ ahead, she can win no more than $1$ game out of the next three, lest Bob be unable to be just $1$ behind. At round 20, one of them attains the 5 win lead and the game ends. How to stop a toddler (seventeen months old) from hitting and pushing the TV? Viewed 2k times 1 $\begingroup$ I heard this recently and it got me thinking.

For example, if you play Paper and your opponent lost by playing Rock, you should play Rock because your opponent is most likely to play Scissors in the next game.

(You need to consider the number of orderings of these outcomes.) First Polygon; SSA Counterexample: Don't Be an A** circumcenter

Here is where im stuck.

Possibility it is Winnie-pants: Winnie-pants won game 20 otherwise the match would have ended earlier. So. The possibilities are rev 2020.11.2.37934, The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Mathematics Stack Exchange works best with JavaScript enabled, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site, Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us. For $Y$ to win, he/she must win $6$ and tie $1$. And of the three remaining games: -- all were draws, so 3 of 6 where draws rest were winnie-pants wins: ${6 \choose 3} = 6*5*4/1*2*3 = 20$ ways. How is it possible for a company that has never made money to have positive equity? Probability Bob is ahead after 13 games: $3/10$. The main issue with your solution occurs when you assert that, all outcomes occur with equal probability. (1-p) and lose w.p.

if $p>1/3.$, If you play scissors, you can win or draw. Thus, ignoring the draw for now, we can have a win/loss ($W/ L$) sequence of $LWWWW$, $WLWWW$, $WWLWW$, or $WWWLW$; now, by inserting the draw into any of the sequences, we see that there are $6$ ways for each ordering of wins and losses to happen, meaning there are a total of $6 \times 4 = 24$ valid ways for $X$ to win $5$, lose $1$, and tie $1$ such that he/she wins exactly at Round 20. How she got that way doesn't matter so the following 5 lines are utterly wasted. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. What are "non-Keplerian" orbits? How else do you approach this problem? Is it a good idea to shove your arm down a werewolf's throat if you only want to incapacitate them? Does this use of the perfect actually express something about the future? Statistical Variation: Foundation to Year 10. $$\text{Alice wins 5, Bob wins 4, 4 draws}$$ Author has published a graph but won't share their results table. After 13 rounds, one or the other is 1 ahead. Discover Resources. This is an increasing linear if $b<\frac 13$ and decreasing otherwise. As fleablood mentioned, it does not matter how this came to be. Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. period. Students are likely to see that, while the simulated games produce random results, human games do not.

$$\text{Alice wins 4, Bob wins 9, 7 draws} - Lose$$ Did "music pendants" exist in the 1800s/early 1900s? While it is marked as a Year 6 resource it could be used at many other year levels!

However the losie pant's win most occur before the last winnie-pants win or else winnie-pants would have been up by 5. The reSolve: Maths by Inquiry project is managed by the Australian Academy of Science in collaboration with the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. How many times do you roll damage for Scorching Ray? Round 13: Let person $X$ be in the lead, with person $Y$ behind by $1$. $$\text{Alice wins 2, Bob wins 1, 7 draws}$$

At round 20, one of them attains the 5 win lead and the game ends.

I think you overlooked the fact that the five game lead can not happen before game 20.

Putting it all together, we have $7p = P(\text{Alice leads})$ and $2p = P(\text{Bob leads})$, where $p = \frac{1}{10}$. $$\text{Alice wins 6, Bob wins 5, 2 draws}$$

After 10 rounds Alice is a ahead by 1. How to stop a toddler (seventeen months old) from hitting and pushing the TV? Stack Exchange network consists of 176 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Let's say you and an opponent are playing rock/paper/scissors. The easiest one is $\mathbb{P}(\text{A wins} \mid \text{B leads})$. The possibilities are \begin{align} Why sister [nouns] and not brother [nouns]? This means you should play the move that they just played. So we must first find the probability that Alice wins given that Alice has the lead, and the probability that Alice wins given that Bob has the lead. site design / logo © 2020 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa. As each way to end the game is equally likely, we find .. oh, scrod. Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. What is the optimal strategy to win?

Is the nucleus smaller than the electron? @fleablood, I take that in account by making sure the 19 round is won by Bob if Alice wins once in the last rounds, or round 19 is draw and round 18 is won by Bob, so that Alice wins before Bob has a 5 game lead. So either: 1) Bob was ahead: Bob won 2 rounds, and third was a draw. 20 ways. Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. Taking a derivative doesn't work since the first derivative tells us nothing about whether its maximized, minimized or saddle point. Rock Paper Scissor - Probability Game. $$\text{Alice wins 10, Bob wins 5, 5 draws} - Win$$ How can I calculate the odds of winning successive games of paper/scissors/rock? The reSolve team is about to commence writing a series of new resources as part of our work on learning progressions. They generate their wins at random, so, in each round, the outcomes are equiprobably win, lose or draw. So the expected winning is p. If you play scissors, you'll win w.p. p and draw w.p. My initial approach is to not play paper (since you can only lose/draw so its not optimal) and play rock with probability $$a$$ and scissor with probability $$1-a$$.

Suppose your opponent plays paper w.p.

\mathbb{P}(\text{A wins} \mid \text{B leads}) = 1 - \mathbb{P}( \text{B wins} \mid \text{B leads}) = 1 - \mathbb{P}(\text{A wins} \mid \text{A leads}).

However, there are observable patterns and regularities in the human form of the game and so the results of these games are not random. For Bob to gain a lead of $1$, there is only one possibility: From this (and the knowledge that each individual outcome is equiprobable), we see that the information from Round 10 implies that it is $\frac{7}{3}$ times as likely for Alice to be ahead at the onset of Round 13 than it is for Bob.

.